|
Post by Jeff on Aug 19, 2011 23:18:15 GMT -5
Agreed, Tyson, as a host I was pretty surprised at the effort or lack thereof.
To all - Ethan did tell us he was in the hospital, but we decided as hosts that after 44 of the 48 hours had already passed, we were really in no position to turn back and change/re-do/delay the challenge. We hope you all understand our position and why we felt it would only be fair to those (James/Tom) who had already spent their time posting and had followed the schedule of the challenge.
|
|
|
Post by Nate Gonzalez on Aug 19, 2011 23:19:21 GMT -5
I approve the decision.
|
|
|
Post by Monica Padilla on Aug 19, 2011 23:20:00 GMT -5
I'm still voting Andrea.
|
|
|
Post by Ty Apostol on Aug 19, 2011 23:37:04 GMT -5
even 25 isn't that good of score.
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Aug 19, 2011 23:39:12 GMT -5
If I were in this game, I'd probably have 100 or more.
|
|
|
Post by Monica Padilla on Aug 20, 2011 0:13:50 GMT -5
I took an insanity test and found I'm out 28% insane...is that bad?
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Aug 20, 2011 0:15:13 GMT -5
I think it depends on what the scale is.
Is anything over 0% considered insane?
Or is 100% insane and 0% normal. lol.
|
|
|
Post by Monica Padilla on Aug 20, 2011 0:23:34 GMT -5
100 is insane, 0 is normal.
But I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to get a 0 because then you must have ZERO personality
|
|
|
Post by Jaime Dugan on Aug 20, 2011 7:39:39 GMT -5
Voting for Andrea because she had a good social game? Are you guys that bitter?! BITCH PLEASE!
I'm not even considering voting for her because she only talked with me when she wanted something from me. That's being fake, in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Monica Padilla on Aug 20, 2011 10:40:04 GMT -5
I'm not voting for James or Tom, so she's the only one left
|
|
|
Post by Ty Apostol on Aug 20, 2011 11:10:52 GMT -5
100 is insane, 0 is normal. But I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to get a 0 because then you must have ZERO personality Actually if you get a 0 on a how much your insane test... it means your SANE
|
|
|
Post by Ty Apostol on Aug 20, 2011 11:20:09 GMT -5
Voting for Andrea because she had a good social game? Are you guys that bitter?! BITCH PLEASE! I'm not even considering voting for her because she only talked with me when she wanted something from me. That's being fake, in my opinion. No because after we turned on all of them. She'd still talk to me while James wouldn't and the one time i did to Tom he was kind of a dick. It is probably 45/45/10 right now but if she has good answers i'll consider it.
|
|
|
Post by Nate Gonzalez on Aug 20, 2011 14:00:56 GMT -5
I'm 60/40 for James and Tom
Myself and Jaime seem to be in the same vote, Andrea did not play a good social game by my standards, and since my vote is up to me, it's my choice to eliminate her from the running, as it should be.
|
|
|
Post by Ty Apostol on Aug 20, 2011 14:16:12 GMT -5
I never said it wasn't up to you.
|
|
|
Post by Monica Padilla on Aug 20, 2011 21:59:05 GMT -5
100 is insane, 0 is normal. But I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to get a 0 because then you must have ZERO personality Actually if you get a 0 on a how much your insane test... it means your SANENope. Boring people get 0
|
|